All content provided by Adrants and MarketingVOX
ad:tech blog ARCHIVES

Media Mix Modeling ‘Nonsense,’ Says Panelist

Posted by Steve Hall · Thursday November 06, 2003

Even though “media mix modeling” was the title of our session, Erwin Ephron dominated the session with arguments that intelligent mixing isn’t happening.  TV-think still dominates the way advertisers and agencies understand online audiences, so any pretense of intelligent mixing is bogus, he said. 

Television is a reach/continuity model, he said. Agencies are combining
television dayparts to reach all viewers. When you don’t know much, as is the case with television, it is important to reach everyone. But with more targetted media like the Internet, reach is less of any issue, Ephron said.

Telivision planning seeks to avoid overlap - online should seek overlap to best reach target audiences with synergistic messages. “If you try to integrate media on today’s terms, you doing on TV’s terms,” said Ephron.

Dave Smith chimed in: “The reason we don’t know more today is, for the last 40 years, 95 percent of the fortune 500 have spent their money on day-after recall performance testing. Even the big guys have not tested enough money on media mix.”

Although people want integrated media planning, “The idea that all media have to be integrated and work together right now is nonsense,” Ephron said.  Given the still rudimentary knowledge of audiences, the best idea is “disintegration of media planning.”

First, establish your goals, then allocate dollars to the goals. “Then when you have those budgets, you look at what media most serves those goals.”

“We are far better off today, letting each medium operate on its own and letting the agencies allocate based on tasks,” said Ephron.

Ephron argued that the end is near for television arrogance. “Advertisers are becoming aware that you can’t do it all through telesision. Prices have constantly escalated. TV advertisers were terrified by a research report saying TV commercial exposures reduce by 30 percent over next four years. TV prices have increased by 30 percent over the last four years, what the hell is the difference?”

TV costs too much, is too fragmented, advertisers have got to look to other media. Don’t say “we are like TV,” because we are not.

When asked whether there isn’t too easy to assume that there are just three players in the media game: audience, publisher and advertiser. Doesn’t this ignore that the most interesting stuff going on online is p2p? Whether Napster, eBay, Slashdot, Drudge or blogs, billions of new page impressions are being created and these impressions are far more important to audience than those served by traditional media. Ephron agreed: “Everyone is panicked. Nobody is dealing with it.”

Participants were: Dave Smith of Mediasmith: , Erwin Ephron of Ephron, Papazian and Ephron: , David Song MPG/Media contact , Karen Anderson

Related topics: NY 03, Track 4: Performance Marketing
MarketingVOX Sponsor

Add Comment






Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Email this Story to a Friend







ad:tech home
ad:tech schedule
ad:tech speakers
contact ad:tech
SCHED for ad:tech




View Larger Map


Archives

the chair speaks

sf 08 conference info
sf 08 sessions
sf 08 keynotes
sf 08 exhibit hall
sf 08 parties

new york 07 conference info
new york 07 sessions
new york 07 keynotes
new york 07 exhibit hall
new york 07 parties

chicago 07 conference info
chicago 07 sessions
chicago 07 keynotes
chicago 07 exhibit hall
chicago 07 parties

miami 07 conference info
miami 07 sessions
miami 07 keynotes
miami 07 exhibit hall
miami 07 parties

sf 07 conference info
sf 07 sessions
sf 07 speakers
sf 07 exhibit hall
sf 07 parties

ny 06 conference info
ny 06 sessions
ny 06 keynotes
ny 06 exhibit hall
ny 06 parties


ch 06 conference info
ch 06 sessions
ch 06 keynotes
ch 06 exhibit hall
ch 06 parties


sf 06 conference info
sf 06 sessions
sf 06 keynotes
sf 06 exhibit hall
sf 06 parties

impact series

ad:tech rss feeds


about this site

dmg world media owns ad:techblog and has contracted MarketingVOX and Adrants to produce the content. MarketingVOX and Adrants maintain complete editorial independence and assume full responsibility for editorial and advertising content.